| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 63 post(s) |
RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
6
   |
Posted - 2012.09.19 01:15:00 -
[1] - Quote
CCP YOU JUST MADE THE TENGU USELESS AND NOT ON PAR WITH THE REST OF ITS T3 COUNTERPARTS, "-Damage decreased by 20% (rounded to closest digit)" MISSILES ARELEADY HAD LOW DPS AS OF RIGHT KNOW DO YOU EVEN PLAY THIS GAME. BATPHONING CSM
Heavy Missiles
-Base flight time reduced by 30%
-Base velocity increased by 6.66%
-In total, base range reduced by ~25%
-Damage decreased by 20% (rounded to closest digit)
-Affects all variant Heavy missiles, including FOF.
Tech Two Missiles
-At the moment Fury missiles at Light and Heavy sizes have a faster explosion velocity than precision missiles, weGÇÖll be fixing this defect as part of the changes.
-Remove ship penalties from tech two missiles (ship velocity and signature radius)
Precision: Increase bonuses to explosion velocity and explosion radius, increase damage to match T1 missiles, reduce flight time slightly
Fury: Increase damage, increase penalties to explosion radius and velocity
Javelin: Just remove ship penalties
Rage: Reduce range, increase damage slightly |
RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
6
|
Posted - 2012.09.19 14:21:00 -
[2] - Quote
CCP. WHY DON'T YOU JUST RIP OUT THE NEW MISSILE EFFECTS ENGINE FROM INFERNO??? I WILL SAVE CPU AND YES I KNOW I CAN TURN OFF THE SETTINGS BUT THAT DOESN'T STOP THE OTHER GUY. PRETTY GRAPHICS DON'T JUSTIFY THEM WITH S~ITTY DPS. YUO ARE MAKING THIS GAME UNPLAYABLE. YOU ARE ONLY JUST CREATING A PURPETUAL ENDLESS CYCLE, GOONS WILL JUSTB. CHANGE THEIR DOCTRINE NOTHING MOAR. You MIGHT AS WELL HAVE A JOVIAN INVASION AND GO SCORCHED EARTH ON JITA. JUST REMOVE THE CALDARI RACE OUT OF THE GAME PLZ BECAUSE YOU JUST NEUTERED THEM FOREVER. CONFERMING EVE IS ON THE SAME ROAD OF UO. |
RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 02:52:00 -
[3] - Quote
CCP Fozzie wrote:Rommiee wrote:CCP Fozzie wrote:Are you even open to changing any of this or are you just planning to ignore everyone?
We are a long way from release and none of these proposals are set in stone. What I will say is that we are set in the belief that heavy missiles do need changes to bring them closer in power to other long range weapons. The details of how that happens is definitely up for debate.
Is that the same type of debate that took place on SISI over the new unified inventory ? That is, pretend to listen and ignore everyone ? I obviously can't speak for that situation since I wasn't working here at the time, but I'd simply ask you to keep an open mind and judge these balance changes and the debate around them on their own merit.
Opened mind?,I you mean roll out the changes and walk away and off the nerf another mechenic??? I can tell you based on your numbers the nerf is way too high to begin with, you are basing these changes because a large group of individuals are playing in a sandbox and can field the same doctrine and chew threw their target.
Now here's the progression i see moving forward, winter comes and the HM changes are implemented, a certain group individuals will just adapt and change their doctrine to something else, after bout 6 to 12 months some EMO ragin and tears will go on from some unkowns (You know who you are) crying to CCP begging for a nerf because flava of the month is SO called "Overpowered" and it''s killing "Emergent gameplay" or "small gang warfare", Again CCP follows direction and nerfs said mechenic and said individuals adapt to new doctrine again, It's an endless cycle you see......... My question How many nerfs to this game until you make this game unplayable.? discuss
|
RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 03:43:00 -
[4] - Quote
This is true i can confierm, Wut say the powers that be? |
RAGE QU1T
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
8
|
Posted - 2012.09.20 04:08:00 -
[5] - Quote
BrokenBC wrote:@ Hans Jagerblitzen, at least we know which csm not to vote for next election!!! this Nerf is way over the top.
Conferming i hear crickets on the CSM's skipe. |
| |
|